Oh yeah, I totally forgot about the live version, thanks for pointing it out.
So yeah, to do a 180 and almost contradict myself hear, but you know, they could have added a linear phase filter, at least as a choice.
I will add though, I don’t often use linear phase filters. Not that I don’t like them, it stems from years of writing and tracking into a computer, adding some processing as I go, but also trying to not to add to latency as I build the track. So by default linear phase eqs were just someone. I never thought about alot, despite having a couple.
The trick I find with working with non-linear phase eqs, commonly known as minimal phase, is to not park the filter where it “looks” like it should go, but where it “sounds” like it should go. Not to confuse this wth an annoying and unhelpful “use your ears” passive aggressive statement.
What I actually mean is that because of it being not linear phase, where you place the filter or a crossover in a a multiband compressor, is obviously going to do a bit of shaping to that sound.
So you just take advantage of that aspect and park it in place where it’s actually helping to carve out some unwanted frequencies, in the case of a crossover. In the case of a LPF I’m placing it where it 's removing enough of the unwanted frequencies, but isn’t having a negative impact on the fundamental. That is unless I think the fundamental does need a bit of toning down, in which case I place it higher.
This all regardless of what the visualiser looks like. After all, the visualiser isn’t the thing that people will be listening to. It’s there as a guide and really shouldn’t be treated like gospel.